Need Help? Call Us   |   412.802.6666

Flaherty Fardo

logo

Article Network
Blog

Judge Denies Request to Lower Assessments

judge bench

Published on by

Leave a Comment

Judge R. Stanton Wettick has denied a request to automatically lower hundreds of thousands of property assessments in poorer neighborhoods. Attorney Don Driscoll argued that a recent independent study demonstrated that poorer neighborhoods were paying more than their fair share. The motion was denied because the court determined that the Pennsylvania Supreme Court did not intend to allow the court to consider the “fairness of the assessments”, only the procedure for conducting it. The court wrote: “It does not provide for judicial oversight with respect to issues regarding the fairness of a reassessment.”

Mr. Driscoll, the attorney who initiated the reassessment through a lawsuit, now argued that the new assessment values should be revised, because approximately 300,000 properties in Allegheny County are overassessed as a result of the new assessment values, and properties in low-income areas were erroneously given higher percentage increases than homes in wealthier communities.

Allegheny County argued that although these new values are not perfect, “The Supreme Court has repeatedly recognized that taxation is not a matter of exact science and that absolute equality or perfect uniformity is not necessary to satisfy the constitutional requirements of uniformity and equal protection.” The County then noted that the appeals process will continue year after year, so these values will always be shifting.

The County is currently under a Court Order to calculate the new total value for real estate assessments by December 17, 2012. School and local taxing entities need this information to calculate their millage rates for 2013. The County is currently in the process of proposing its 2013 budget, and should have a tentative 2013 millage rate by the end of the year.

As the impact of this ongoing litigation looms, the Office of Property Assessments continues to hear up to one thousand appeals every day in an attempt to complete the appeals process by the end of the year. Though the majority of appeals have already been heard, there are still approximately 15,000 appeals that have not been heard at this point. Appeal hearings will be scheduled through the end of the year, and the likelihood that the Office of Property Assessments will be able to complete all decisions by the end of the year is extremely small.

Property owners who have already attended hearings should expect to receive the decision from this appeal in approximately 2-3 months. Property owners who are dissatisfied with this decision have thirty days from the “Mailing Date” listed on this decision to file an appeal to the Board of Viewers.

If you have any additional questions about property assessments, or would like a free consultation about your property appeal case, please feel free to contact Attorney Noah Paul Fardo or Attorney Nicole Hauptman for a free consultation at (412) 802-6666, or email our office at info@pghfirm.com.


This article is written for entertainment purposes only. It should not be relied upon for legal advice, and in no way does this article create an attorney/client relationship. We only represent individual(s) once there is a signed representation and fee agreement in place. Please read full legal Disclaimer.


more about Allegheny County property assessment appeals.


Read Our Latest Property Assessment Articles:

    more from our: Allegheny County Assessment Blog

    About Nicole Hauptman

    Attorney Nicole M. Hauptman is a partner in the Pittsburgh law firm of Flaherty Fardo, LLC. She practices in medical malpractice, serious personal injuries and real estate litigation. She may be contacted at nicole@pghfirm.com or you can find her on Google+.

    Leave a Reply

    Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

    You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

    Logos